AYRAULT (Pierre) – THE ORDER, FORMALITY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE USED BY THE ANCIENT GREEKS AND ROMANS AND PUBLIC ACCUSATIONS (WHILE THEY HAD BEGUN TO EXECUTE) CONFERRED TO THE STYLE AND USAGE OF OUR FRANCE with the fourth Book where the
AYRAULT (Pierre) – THE ORDER, FORMALITY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE USED BY THE ANCIENT GREEKS AND ROMANS AND PUBLIC ACCUSATIONS (WHILE THEY HAD BEGUN TO EXECUTE) CONFERRED TO THE STYLE AND USAGE OF OUR FRANCE with the fourth Book where the
AYRAULT (Pierre) – THE ORDER, FORMALITY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE USED BY THE ANCIENT GREEKS AND ROMANS AND PUBLIC ACCUSATIONS (WHILE THEY HAD BEGUN TO EXECUTE) CONFERRED TO THE STYLE AND USAGE OF OUR FRANCE with the fourth Book where the
    AYRAULT (Pierre)
    The order, formality, and judicial procedure used by the ancient Greeks and Romans, and public accusations (unless they had begun execution), conferred upon the style and practice of our France, with the fourth book, which discusses the corpse, memory, inanimate objects, beasts of burden, and contumacious persons. Revised, corrected, and augmented, second edition.
Édition :
    Paris
Date :
    1598
    in-4, full contemporary glazed blond calf, title on burgundy paper, very fine fleurons, gilt lace and fillets framing the spine with 5 raised bands, blind tooling framing the covers, red edges, gilt roll on the edges, Ex-Libris on the title page, initial letters, (1 wormhole through the front cover and the first 20 leaves in the lower margin without affecting the text, joint split for 3.5 cm with a small loss to the headcap, edges and corners slightly bumped), good condition, [4 leaves]-646 pages-[15 leaves].
    Dupin does not hesitate to place Ayrault's work at the beginning of his chapter devoted to Treatises on Criminal Law; and indeed, the reasons are numerous. This text is as atypical in its approach as it is innovative in its positions. Ayrault is among the very few criminal law jurists of the time (along with A. Tiraqueau and J. Imbert) who strove to combine their theoretical research with courtroom experience, often resorting to the analysis of the foundations of Roman law as a legitimate legal basis. In essence, he "criticizes the maintenance of strict secrecy in extraordinary proceedings, the very significant power of the investigating judge, the difficulty of the defense, etc." (C. Saphore, Dictionnaire historique des juristes français, Paris, PUF, 2007). Finally, from an editorial point of view, and contrary to what S. Saphore mentions in this dictionary, we present here the second edition [the first dates from 1591] - during the author's lifetime, the most cited in particular by Berriat Saint-Prix but also abundantly plagiarized by Montesquieu as Faustin-Hélie points out in his Treatise on Criminal Procedure (2nd ed., Paris, 1866, vol. I, p. 3 et seq.)

Référence : 35324

Malheureusement, ce livre n'est plus disponible.

Pour être informé lorsque nous recevrons un prochain exemplaire, merci de compléter le formulaire ci-dessous :

5 + 8 =